From: Chris McCurry <CMCCURR@v...>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 19:26:04 -0400
Subject: Re:allegiance
Oh dear..I see the civil war is starting late this year. As a matter of interest what is the allegiance of the various people on this list to the various power blocks in Full thrust? Being rather a fan of NSL ships I suppose thats where my allegiance lies. Anyone else? And do we have any seconders for the Hibernian republic? Free Guinness to all who support it.
From: Tony Wilkinson <twilko@o...>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 08:41:58 -0400
Subject: Re:allegiance
The Oceanic Union all the way. My fleet has NSL, FSE and NAC designs as well
as some home grown (Silent Death patrol ships actually). My infantry are OU
except the power armour which is NSL (unless Nic at Eureka comes up with
something else.
Tony
twilko@ozemail.com.au
> At 06:26 PM 9/2/97 -0500, you wrote:
From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 13:42:13 -0400
Subject: Re:allegiance
In message <86256506.00807F82.00@notes.vastar.com> > "Chris McCurry" <CMCCURR@vastar.com> wrote: > Oh dear..I see the civil war is starting late this year. As a matter The problem with this question is that anyone who doesn't support the Neu Swabian League is obviously misguided, and probably slightly insane, and therefore their views don't count. :)
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 16:08:36 -0400
Subject: Re:allegiance
> On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, Samuel Penn wrote: > In message <86256506.00807F82.00@notes.vastar.com> A Brit as an ardent supporter of Prussian expansionism? Sir, you don't know your history, and His Majesty's Secret Service is going to come and have a word with you. Granted their NAC allies at present, but still, sir, they ARE Germans, most of them...:) Only kidding...they do have cool ship designs, tho.
From: Kyle Klingler <kklinglr@f...>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 17:28:35 -0400
Subject: Re:allegiance
> On Thu, 4 Sep 1997, Brian Burger wrote: > Only kidding...they do have cool ship designs, tho. I wanted to step in from lurking and say that I agree. I have more SWL ships than any other.
From: Groucho <paulf@d...>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 03:09:42 -0400
Subject: Re: allegiance
> Samuel Penn wrote: You mean there are non NSL allied personnel on the list shame on them 8)) ciao Paul
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 04:58:25 -0400
Subject: Re:allegiance
> On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, Samuel Penn wrote: > The problem with this question is that anyone who doesn't Well.. I _do_ have some NSL ships, but I use them as Orks - the ships are clunky enough for that - since one of my main fleets consists of Eldar "sailing" ships (GW and conversions) :-)
From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 14:09:31 -0400
Subject: Re:allegiance
In message <Pine.OSF.3.95.970904130611.26625D-100000@ccins.camosun.bc.ca> > Brian Burger <burger00@camosun.bc.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, Samuel Penn wrote: > A Brit as an ardent supporter of Prussian expansionism? Sir, you don't I know, I know, but I started collecting NSL before I'd even heard of FT, just because they looked practical. And anayway, shouldn't that be "they ARE foreigners"?. I mean, as long as they're not French, all foreigners are the same aren't they?:) > Only kidding...they do have cool ship designs, tho. Yep.