From: Albert.W.Cho@k...
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:01:16 -0700
Subject: Albert W Cho is out of the office
I will be out of the office starting 06/17/2011 and will not return until 06/27/2011.
From: Albert.W.Cho@k...
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:01:16 -0700
Subject: Albert W Cho is out of the office
I will be out of the office starting 06/17/2011 and will not return until 06/27/2011.
From: Evyn MacDude <infojunky@c...>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:37:06 -0700
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
Haven't we been attacked by Albert" auto responder before? > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 22:01, <Albert.W.Cho@kp.org> wrote: > I will be out of the office starting 06/17/2011 and will not return
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:13:38 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:37:06PM -0700, Evyn MacDude wrote: I'm working from a partial copy of the list of members. There may be a few days of tidying up. (Anyone who doesn't want to get this version of the list, you can use the links in the headers to unsubscribe yourself, or you can write to me and I'll do it.)
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:16:22 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:37:06PM -0700, Evyn MacDude wrote: Thanks for doing this, Roger - what does everyone here think, is it time to let the "old" list quietly expire and to make this one the new "main" list? Roger, would you still be happy with doing that?
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:33:30 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0100, Ground Zero Games wrote:
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:52:13 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0100, Ground Zero Games wrote: OK Roger, thanks again! Now, another related question for everyone here, about the status of the GZG list in general..... I've always been quite careful NOT to make it appear as if this is an "official" GZG mailing list - it has always been a fan-run, fan-centred list of folk of whom I just happen to be a part. Now, I'd like to put a subscribing link up on the new webstore - still making clear that the list is a separate fan community and not "run" by (or for) me and GZG - but of course if I do this, I think there may be quite a large influx of new subscribers...... do those of you already here actually want that, or are you happy with the current fairly small group of active members with just the occasional one added now and then via word-of-mouth? Incidentally I'm STILL very unsure of whether or not to have a forum linked to the website, but if I did decide to do that at some point I would hope that such a forum could happily co-exist alongside the mailing list, serving similar but distinct functions. Please discuss, Gentlemen (and our few rare and prized Ladies)! ;-)
From: Robin Fitton <contactrobin@h...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:52:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
I agree, one new main list would be great.
From: David Billinghurst <davebill@c...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:54:19 +1200
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
I thought the last time Albert attacked, you guys nicked all his stuff ;) Obviously, I'm still on the partial list, and I'm partial to remaining on the list, though a digest version would be nice. David [quoted original message omitted]
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:13:00 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:54:19PM +1200, davebill wrote: There is now a digest available, and Dave is on it. (He'll see this some time tomorrow...)
From: Bryan <brakeb@g...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:37:29 -0500
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
I didn't even know there was more than one list... dang it... > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:52, Robin <bilgepipe@mac.com> wrote:
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:47:13 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
> I didn't even know there was more than one list... dang it... There isn't really, Brian - because the Berkeley-hosted "main" list has been so unstable for a long while now, Roger BW has very kindly been using his Firedrake server to host a back-up for the list, which gets used when the main server is playing silly b*ggers again. What we're talking about is just shifting all the list traffic to Firedrake, and letting the Berkeley list expire in a semi-dignified manner. To all intents and purposes it will be the same list, with the same folks (provided they want to move with it) and the same content - it will just WORK, hopefully! ;-) Jon (GZG) > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:52, Robin <bilgepipe@mac.com> wrote:
From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:29:37 +1000
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
G'day, I don't think having a link on the site would be a bad thing, it might be a good stimulus to get some new blood here - though it will mean people will have to be tolerant of the odd topic that has been discussed before.... though for some of us our memory is so shot we probably won't notice that its a work over;) Cheers
From: David Rodemaker <dar@h...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:40:37 -0500
Subject: RE: Albert W Cho is out of the office
> I've always been quite careful NOT to make it appear as if this is an In general, I think more exposure is good. I rarely comment here, but I read it whenever, and some of the old posts sit very quietly in their own little folder for whenever I might need a house rule, etc. If there is fresh blood out there, let's get it into play... D.
From: Tom B <kaladorn@g...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:21:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
I'd need to update my instructions on stargrunt.ca, but I'm willing to see that happen. T. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:33, Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:16:22AM +0100, Ground Zero Games wrote:
From: Bryan <brakeb@g...>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:39:34 -0500
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
I did a 'like on the facebook page, but I didn't see a place to post things... Maybe we have a place to post alternative rules, etc... > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:21, Tom B <kaladorn@gmail.com> wrote:
From: hott <hott@h...>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:56:18 +0100
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
Ditto :-) Not that I count as an 'active' member Kev ---- Original Message ---- From: brakeb@gmail.com To: gzg@firedrake.org Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:37:29 -0500 > I didn't even know there was more than one list... dang it...
From: Bobby Mock <hansuke@g...>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:26:49 -0500
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative On a side note related to the post title: Is Albert W Cho really out of the office, or is he just on an intergalactic cruise? Will someone please find his secretary so we can suss this out?
From: Evyn MacDude <infojunky@c...>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:09:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:26, Bobby <hansuke@gmail.com> wrote: > textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative Did we ever find the answer when he was gone over christmas break in 2005? Yes this isn't the 1st time Albert has gone missing...
From: Indy Kochte <kochte@s...>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:15:31 -0400
Subject: Re: Albert W Cho is out of the office
textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Evyn MacDude <infojunky@ceecom.net> wrote: > textfilter: chose text/plain from a multipart/alternative He's a NAC agent. Mk