From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 20:33:31 -0800
Subject: Re: ADS ... laserlight &ndedge
> Its on the bottom of page 19 ADS against ground target.. it says
No, it implies that you can fire at ground targets regardless of whether your
ADS is lit or not.
From - Wed Jan 03 11:05:24 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA06160;
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 20:07:31 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBS1wrA01831;
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 27 Dec
2000 17:58:52 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBS1wpx01810
for gzg-l-outgoing; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:HNrkXnFTZq2xV4KvUwIWFLVKdGwzOvNh@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBS1wnH01805
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:58:49
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.quixnet.net (psmtp3.array3.laserlink.net
[63.65.123.53] (may be forged))
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBS1wnp48849
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:58:49 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from laserlight@quixnet.net)
Received: from pavilion (1Cust85.tnt18.princess-anne.va.da.uu.net
[63.31.7.85])
by smtp3.quixnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA18032
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 20:58:47 -0500
(EST)
Message-ID: <006601c0708a$b31269a0$55071f3f@pavilion>
From: "Laserlight" <laserlight@quixnet.net>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <OFA050B9E4.2546DA6C-ON862569BF.006CB5F8@uneb.edu>
<003501c06e96$cc005ee0$b729d03f@pconn><3A499E56.8DE3F852@spikyfishthing. com>
<20001228.193046.9719.0.triphibious@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Suggestions and Advice Solicited!
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 20:57:34 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000aa1
> I meant how the ships were compromised for vector and cinematic and
High thrust and extra firing arcs are more useful in Cinematic than in Vector,
because in Vector you can always turn to face your target and, unless you're
close to your target, you can pretty much guarantee that you can point your F
arc in the right direction. I don't know that I'd say maneuver is less
important in Vector but
it isn't as sweeping--if your target makes an unexpected turn, in
vector you'll be out of arc by a couple of MU. In cinematic, your target may
be on the other side of the map. Fighters and missiles are easier to use in
Vector, for the same reason.
From - Wed Jan 03 11:05:25 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA25124;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 00:39:45 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBS6Hg506687;
Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 27 Dec
2000 22:17:40 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBS6Hdd06666
for gzg-l-outgoing; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:17:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:OGBC2lLhtGwW/AE2afxhgQwGkeVqoIA3@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBS6HbH06661
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:17:38
-0800 (PST)
Received: from iolite.sge.net (iolite.sge.net [152.91.14.26])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBS6Hap71939
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 22:17:36 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au)
Received: from sulphide.sge.net (sulphide.sge.net [152.91.9.7]) by
iolite.sge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72598BE07
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:17:29 +1100
(EST)
Received: from kryptonite2.sge.net (unknown [10.1.2.20]) by sulphide.sge.net
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECEACB703
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 04:17:24 +1100
(EST)
Received: from thorium1 (thorium1.sge.net [10.1.2.35]) by kryptonite2.sge.net
(Postfix) with SMTP id 74DB53CF01
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:17:28 +1100
(EST)
Received: FROM uvite BY thorium1 ; Thu Dec 28 17:18:13 2000 +1100
Message-ID: <B18DDC5F1158D311A66900805FD47181C89D1C@VSTASV1>
From: "Robertson, Brendan" <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: [FT] SML-AF
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:19:05 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000aa4
It looks more usable than the original idea. It would certainly be a nasty
surprise the first time it was used. Might I suggest that aside from the arc
restrictions (and requiring an SML)
that the rest is lifted strait from FB2 - scattergun rules? That way it
will be consistant with those rules (including the drawbacks).
Neath Southern Skies -http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernskies/
[Pirates] Dame Captain Washalot
[MKW2] Admiral Peter Rollins - Task Force Zulu-Beta
[Firestorm] Battletech PBeM GM
> -----Original Message-----
From - Wed Jan 03 11:05:26 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA24175;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:47:43 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBSCFj310553;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:15:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 28 Dec
2000 04:15:41 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBSCFeT10531
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:15:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:27zggEudNXOeO3wBTigrORNj14nBDZqJ@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBSCFcH10526
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:15:38
-0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange01.dscc.dla.mil (exchange01.dscc.dla.mil
[131.74.160.11])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBSCFbp00141
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:15:37 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil)
Received: by exchange01.dscc.dla.mil with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19)
id <W6J83X0G>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:15:11 -0500
Message-ID:
<9DB05BB477A8D111AF3F00805F5730100D100734@exchange01.dscc.dla.mil>
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: [SG2] EW Unit
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:15:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000aa6
I will stick my head in here to make a suggestion.
Shift the active EW unit's Cover Die (the die it rolls while hidden when
another unit is attempting to spot it) DOWN 1 if it is active and DOWN 1 for
each EW counter it has used this turn (open shift).
The above may or may not make sense depending on how you envision the future
of combat. I would think that every soldier would have some passive sensors
(IR, UV, Light, Radio, Microwave, Ultrasonic) to aid the soldier in viewing
the area and to let him know
if he/she is being ranged (radar, sonar, etc.). And thus would know
when EW equipment is being used for jamming, searching, disruption
of sensors/guidance, or punching a communication through jamming.
EW units in passive mode (not active) would certainly have such sensors.
Going further on PSB, the EW unit if it started the game in position, could
have land lines to a remote antenna or antenna array that would not give away
its position, but would give the antenna's position away. Thus the antenna
could be eliminated, but the EW unit switch to another remote antenna
(requires an action). If the EW unit moves, it does not have access to the
antenna grid and must rely on the
EW equipment's built-in antenna.
-----
Brian Bell bkb@beol.net
http://www.ftsr.org/sg2/
-----
> -----Original Message-----
<Al.Bri@xtra.co.nz>
> wrote:
From - Wed Jan 03 11:05:26 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA25915;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:58:23 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBSCacs10765;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 28 Dec
2000 04:36:37 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBSCaaF10744
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:ge/365meE7Q+0jjecndEGiMxDtGnvRBc@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBSCaYH10739
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:36:34
-0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange01.dscc.dla.mil (exchange01.dscc.dla.mil
[131.74.160.11])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBSCaYp01565
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:36:34 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil)
Received: by exchange01.dscc.dla.mil with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19)
id <W6J83YAX>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:36:08 -0500
Message-ID:
<9DB05BB477A8D111AF3F00805F5730100D100735@exchange01.dscc.dla.mil>
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: Proto SG2 campaign system
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:36:07 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000aa7
Light Artillery has a minimum of 24" (SG) and all other has a mimimum of 48"
(SG).
Another list of items on the DS2/SG2 Harmonization list. Minimum range
for artiller in DS would be 2" light, 5" all others.
-----
Brian Bell bkb@beol.net
http://www.ftsr.org/sg2/
-----
> -----Original Message-----
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA27645;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:09:35 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBSClUY10859;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 28 Dec
2000 04:47:29 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBSClSQ10838
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:2bNw3tzaMYfnagDw+CINJlLu9GoZm2oS@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBSClRH10833
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:47:27
-0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange01.dscc.dla.mil (exchange01.dscc.dla.mil
[131.74.160.11])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBSClQp02009
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 04:47:26 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil)
Received: by exchange01.dscc.dla.mil with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19)
id <W6J83YBV>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:47:00 -0500
Message-ID:
<9DB05BB477A8D111AF3F00805F5730100D100736@exchange01.dscc.dla.mil>
From: "Bell, Brian K (Contractor)" <Brian.Bell@dscc.dla.mil>
To: "'gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu'" <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: ADS
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:46:59 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000aa8
p. 19 - ADS vehicles MAY fire at ground targets if
they do NOT currently have hteir sensors active for defence use.
p. 32 - For an ADS to function it must have its
Sensors ACTIVE.
Thus:
Sensor Status Target Air/Missiles Target Ground
Inactive No Yes Active Yes No
-----
Brian Bell bkb@beol.net
http://www.ftsr.org/ds2/
-----
> -----Original Message-----
From - Wed Jan 03 11:05:27 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA31103;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 07:27:49 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBSD53D11041;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 05:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 28 Dec
2000 05:05:02 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBSD51I11020
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 05:05:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:63X1kz/JQW/fRU8IPKK0mJpr4PYa3uuv@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBSD4xH11011
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 05:04:59
-0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-smtpout1.email.verio.net
(dfw-smtpout1.email.verio.net [129.250.36.41])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBSD4xp03347
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 05:04:59 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from nyrath@clark.net)
Received: from [129.250.38.61] (helo=dfw-mmp1.email.verio.net)
by dfw-smtpout1.email.verio.net with esmtp
id 14Bcjq-0002WF-00
for gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:04:58 +0000
Received: from nyrath.clark.net ([168.143.4.234] helo=clark.net)
by dfw-mmp1.email.verio.net with esmtp
id 14Bcjp-0004Rm-00
for gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:04:58 +0000
Message-ID: <3A4B3995.FF80CF92@clark.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:01:09 -0500
From: Nyrath the nearly wise <nyrath@clark.net>
Organization: the Praeternatural Tower
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: ADS ... laserlight &ndedge
References: <200012272115.NAA15402@mail1.bigmailbox.com>
<01c001c0704c$5d4062e0$0d44ae3e@default>
<000701c07059$70c78ca0$1e0aa8c0@hqmknt04enu>
<026301c0705d$00427a40$0d44ae3e@default>
<001e01c07078$2292b400$96071f3f@pavilion>
<000201c07066$06a7a8c0$7a4aae3e@default>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000aa9
> chubbybob wrote:
Perhaps a good index could be compiled?
From - Wed Jan 03 11:05:27 2001
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA10163;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:30:41 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBSE8Kf11523;
Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:08:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 28 Dec
2000 06:08:18 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBSE8H211502
for gzg-l-outgoing; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:08:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:Y+q353mJbLrZtliQhvXUXq3JjdokVD80@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBSE8FH11497
for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:08:15
-0800 (PST)
Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net
[207.217.120.123])
by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBSE8Fp07257
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:08:15 -0800
(PST)
(envelope-from patconnaughton@earthlink.net)
Received: from pconn (dialup-63.208.46.66.SaintLouis1.Level3.net
[63.208.46.66])
by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
GAA13030
for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 06:08:13 -0800
(PST)
Message-ID: <031101c070d7$a215ef80$242cd03f@pconn>
From: "Pat Connaughton" <patconnaughton@earthlink.net>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
References: <OFA050B9E4.2546DA6C-ON862569BF.006CB5F8@uneb.edu>
<003501c06e96$cc005ee0$b729d03f@pconn><3A499E56.8DE3F852@spikyfishthing. com>
<20001228.193046.9719.0.triphibious@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Suggestions and Advice Solicited! (reprise)
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:07:55 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de00000aaa
Greetings to the List,
Thanks for your comments, advice and general sharing or the......uhh, wisdom.
Really, was most appreciated. If any one is interested
then I'll post my proto-typical forces on my website.
Also, just to spoil all my feverish calculations and ciphering, has anyone
checked out the special year end deals for
pre-packaged FT units (flotilla's? squadrons? etc) that
Kieran has posted on the GeoHex website? (url is www.geohex.com)
(just when I'd pretty much made up my mind. oh well)
Thanks again for the assistance
En avant