A question of ettiquete and focus

3 posts ยท May 2 2001 to May 3 2001

From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>

Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 15:23:31 -0400

Subject: A question of ettiquete and focus

1) Ettiquette point: A number of us recieve the digest version of the list.
This is made much more compact and faster to traverse and parse in the event
that people replying to posts make a point to excerpt portions of the post
that aren't required. An example would be someone replying to a long post with
a two line reply which does not relate to the post or which only needs a part
of the original reply to make sense. Please spend the time to do this as some
of us are still not on broadband and others get the digest. There are no
penalties for failing to comply, but it is a nice gesture.

2) Focus: There seem to be a number of "where will country X be?" discussion
going on here (and one oddly OT discussion on Rome, which although fascinating
is hardly GZG related). It might strike some as the ultimate irony for me to
be the one bringing this up, but the density of these discussions and the
volume of posting has been high. It seems to me most of the discussion of the
GZG timeline should more properly be taken to the future history discussion
list (I believe this is the gzgpedia list if I'm not mistaken). Jerry or
someone should post the subscription address. Said list was designed for just
this kind of discussion, thus freeing up the main GZG list for further
discussions on game mechanics, rules suggestions, vehicle designs, AARs and
scenarios, etc.

Thank you for your time.

Oh, and one last thing: This is an international list. Whereas I'm not for the
restriction of free
speech (ie you _can_ say whatever you want), it
might be polite to at least keep in mind what a varied audience the list has,
from younger folks on up, some of whom might have different thresholds for
being offended and who come from a wide ethnic and national background. If
we'd all just keep that in mind when bashing other nationalities or
ethnicities, or when just generally expressing ourselves, I'm sure we could
communicate the same amount of information without anyone getting hurt
feelings or being steamed up by someone else's comments. I'll even let people
continue to poke fun at the Scots and the Kiwis... (you'd have to have been on
the test list to appreciate this
one...)

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 21:23:59 EDT

Subject: Re: A question of ettiquete and focus

On Wed, 2 May 2001 15:23:31 -0400 "Thomas Barclay"
<kaladorn@fox.nstn.ca> writes:
> 1) Ettiquette point:
<snip>
> replying to posts make a point to excerpt

Right, have noticed I am not cutting so much as previously. Thanks for the
reminder

> 2) Focus:

Didn't there was such an animal.

> Thank you for your time.

An always valid concern!

> Tomb Raider

From: Brian Bell <bkb@b...>

Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 21:37:52 -0400

Subject: RE: A question of ettiquete and focus

[quoted original message omitted]