From: Tom B <kaladorn@g...>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 11:09:57 -0500
Subject: A Question For Owen G and the other SG2ers.
Hi Owen You caught my attention with a minor comment you made, about equipping squad with d6/d10 SAWs. The idea intrigued me. Why? If you use that as a SAW, what do you use 'rule-book' SAWs as? LMGs? I sort of can see why you'd do this. I can see every squad having a C9 (M249/Minimi if I'm not mistaken). It'll fire from belt, or from rifle mag. But the round is the rifle round (same impact) and the FP isn't a LOT higher than the FP of a rifle firing on burst or auto. I can see the D6 FP almost makes more sense than the D10 FP! And it'll be less unbalancing for modern TO&Es. Also, do you think a 1 point increase in FP for a GL is appropriate? I'm thinking a squad with multi-shot 30mm GLs would be far nastier than a squad with just ARs. You don't get any sort of burst radius with ARs, and they are subsumed in the fire combat by adding 1 pip. Is that a fair reflection? Normally, we tend not to deploy a squad with every man having an AR, and if so they tend to be fire-open-load-close-fire variety, rather than stick in the mag and fire three or five rounds before reloading. I think the addition of this kind of multi-round GL to every man in the squad would be quite a gross increase in FP. Comments?