A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

7 posts ยท Oct 12 1999 to Oct 13 1999

From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 17:36:39 -0400

Subject: A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

Errata:
http://www.cs.utk.edu/~cowell/min/sg2/errata.html
QNA:
http://www.cs.utk.edu/~cowell/min/sg2/qna.html

Thanks to Mr.Cowell!

This is for those who haven't seen it.

On another topic, all you SG2ers and DS2ers....

I have nothing against our friendly neighbourhood FreezerStik(tm)
brand Jarheads, or the vaccuum-heads that chauffeur them around the
galaxy and shake, rattle and roll in the cold reaches of
interplanetary space.... but my first interest is "on the ground" -
SG2 and DS2.

I was sort of thinking of trying to get an SG2/DS2 WebRing put
together.

Is there some interest in this idea? Being on it does not also preclude your
site from being on the FT list, but in preference the URLs on the ring would
be directly DS2 or SG2 related and so flipping through it wouldn't mean
flipping through the full list of FT sites too.

Maybe I'm raving.

Opinions anyone?

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

> On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Thomas Barclay wrote:

> On another topic, all you SG2ers and DS2ers....

I think that enough of the FTRing sites have overlapping interests (all
three games) that a specifically DS2/Sg2 ring would be a bit redundant.
And speaking as a WWWpage owner, more webrings= more hassle...

Besides, I don't mind sharing ringspace with a bunch of vacumnheads.:>
(Actually, I've started playing FTFB recently, so I'll have to stop making
vacumnhead comments. Drat.)

> Maybe I'm raving.

Probably... :>

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 19:16:08 -0400

Subject: Re: A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

> Besides, I don't mind sharing ringspace with a bunch of

"Never criticize your getaway vehicle's driver until _after_
you have gotten away."

From: Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@i...>

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 00:14:11 -0400

Subject: Re: A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

> I was sort of thinking of trying to get an SG2/DS2 WebRing put

Sounds like a fine idea.  Sign me up (well, in spirit anyway - as soon
as my site is up I'll sign up for real...)

From: Andrew Martin <Al.Bri@x...>

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:28:28 +1300

Subject: Re: A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

> Thomas Barclay wrote:

I'm against it myself. My site has a lot of DSII stuff on it, but it
also has GZG-Pedia and FMA (not St^3 Jon's Full Metal Anorak) stuff. It
will probably have FT and SG as well. So the existing FT ring is enough
for me. I also think the existing ring (at, I think, 60+ sites) isn't
overloaded.

But if you decide to go ahead and build a DSII/SG ring, I'll join it to
support it, because it all helps to promote the hobby and GZG.

From: Simon LeRay-Meyer <sleray-meyer@v...>

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 14:40:17 +1000

Subject: RE: A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

I'm in as well.

Simon LeRay-Meyer

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Jeremy Sadler <jsadler@e...>

Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 22:10:49 +1000

Subject: Re: A good Q&A and some SG2 erratta

> I was sort of thinking of trying to get an SG2/DS2 WebRing put

I did have this idea some time ago, but decided not to as the current webring
fulfilled the criteria. I vote instead of the "Full Thrust Webring" it should
be the "Ground Zero Web Ring" or something similar, though:)

---